评语：Phone (3) 是一款旗舰产品，仅在 "Nothing"（无）中才会出现。通过 Phone (3)，Nothing 始终坚持自己的理念，即开发与竞争对手略有不同的智能手机。这体现在透明的背面、不对称的摄像头排列、轻薄快速的 Nothing OS 3.5 以及带有 486 个 LED 的 Glyph Matrix 等附加功能上。
Nothing Phone (3) 拥有五年的操作系统更新和直至 2032 年的软件支持，这为用户提供了更多考虑的理由。其他优点还包括明亮的 AMOLED 屏幕、良好的照相系统和大容量快速充电电池，可以满足一整天的高强度使用。
Test device courtesy of Nothing Germany
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
尽管如此，Nothing Phone (3) 也有一些小缺点。Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 速度很快，但与基本款 799 欧元的售价并不匹配。
此外，它采用的不是 LTPO AMOLED 显示屏，而是 LPTS 显示屏。在显示屏玻璃方面也没有任何改进。许多同价位的智能手机都采用了大猩猩 Victus 玻璃，而 Nothing Phone (3) 却只采用了耐磨性较差的大猩猩 7i 玻璃。
Pros+ 明亮的 120 Hz 显示屏
+ 高性能配备
+ 配备 3x 50 MP 传感器的出色摄像头
+ 16GB 内存和 512GB 存储空间
+ 支持双卡和 eSIM 卡
+ 蓝牙 6.0、Wi-Fi 7 和良好的 GPS 性能
+ 良好的电池续航能力
+ 65 瓦快速充电
+ IP68 认证
+ Glyph Matrix 迷你显示屏...Cons- ......噱头大于实用性
- 没有 LTPO 显示屏
- 性能未达到旗舰水平
- 负载时发热严重
- 不支持 Qi2
价格和供应情况Nothing Phone (3) 配有 12 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间，零售价为 799 欧元，而 16 GB / 512 GB 版本则为 899 欧元。这两个版本在亚马逊等在线商店的售价均低 100 欧元左右。
目前，12 GB / 256 GB 版本的智能手机解锁价为 719 美元，而 16 GB / 512 GB 版本在美国亚马逊的售价为 799 美元。
$657.41Nothing Phone (3) Cell Phone, 5G Unlocked Phones 512GB, Android 15, Snapdragon 8s Gen4, AI Mobile Phones with Four 50MP Cameras & AMOLED Display, 5150mAh, Glyph Interface, Smartphone White
Bestpreis 579 € Gomibo.deNothing Phone (3) 512GB weiß2. 633.05 € galaxus3. 644.75 € galaxus.at4. 699 € Proshop.at
Table of Contents评语：Phone (3) 是一款旗舰产品，仅在 "Nothing"（无）中才会出现。规格构建Glyph Matrix 取代 Glyph 界面功能最高 16GB 内存和 512GB 存储空间软件：Android 更新至 2032 年，以及用于 Glyph Matrix 的 SDK通信和全球导航卫星系统：快速 Wi-Fi 7 和精确导航电话功能和语音质量摄像头：5000 万像素，一包四台附件和保修：不含电源适配器输入设备和操作：无响应手机显示屏120 Hz LTPS AMOLED，90 Hz PWM性能：搭载骁龙 8s 第 4 代处理器的 Nothing Phone (3)游戏：保证游戏流畅排放：无热智能手机能源：配备硅碳电池的无手机 (3)Notebookcheck 对 Nothing Phone 的总体印象 (3)潜在替代品比较
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types ← exclude selected tags
该公司声称，Nothing Phone (3) 是一款真正的旗舰智能手机。可以肯定的是，它在性能、电池容量和软件支持方面超越了以往所有的 Nothing Phone 手机。
不过，我们的评测也显示，Nothing 在某些方面缩减了足够的硬件成分，因此对用户来说并没有明显的劣势。
因此，Nothing Phone（3）给人的感觉就像一款高端智能手机，但实际上却不是。
规格
Nothing Phone (3) (Phone Series)ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 8c/8t, 1 x 3.2 GHz ARM Cortex-X4, 3 x 3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, 2 x 2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, 2 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, Cortex-A720 / Cortex-X4Graphics adapterQualcomm Adreno 825Memory16 GB , LPDDR5XDisplay6.67 inch 20:9, 2800 x 1260 pixel 460 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, LTPS (60, 90, 120 Hz), 10-bit, 1000 Hz touch sampling rate, 960 Hz PWM dimming, 800 nits typical brightness, 4500 nits peak brightness, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 HzStorage512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB , 486 GB freeConnections1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: In-display fingerprint sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic compass, Gyroscope, Proximity sensor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3Networking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/30/34/38/39/40/41/42/48/66/71), 5G (Band n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n25/n28/n30/n38/n40/n41/n48/n66/n71/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 8.99 x 160.6 x 75.59Battery5150 mAh Silicon-Carbon, 65W max. charging speed, 15W wireless charging (Qi 1.3), 7.5W reverse wired charging, 5W reverse wireless charging (Qi 1.3)Chargingwireless charging, fast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 15CameraPrimary Camera: 50 MPix (1/1.3" sensor, f/1.68, OIS & EIS, AF, 2x2 OCL PDAF, 2x in-sensor-zoom) + 50 MP tele (1/2.75" sensor, f/2.68, OIS & EIS, AF, PDAF, 3x optical zoom, 6x in-sensor-zoom, 60x ultra zoom) + 50 MP ultrawide (1/2.76" sensor, f/2.2, EIS, 114° FOV), video recording up to 4K@60fpsSecondary Camera: 50 MPix (1/2.76" sensor, f/2.2. EIS, 81.2° FOV), video recording up to 4K@60fpsAdditional featuresSpeakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, screen protector (pre-applied), SIM tool, Safety card, Nothing OS 3.5, 24 Months Warranty, IP68 certified, Corning Gorilla Glass 7i (front), Corning Gorilla Glass Victus (back), aluminium frame; HDR support: HDR10, HDR10+, HLG; GPS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), Beidou (B1, B2a), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5), SBAS (L1); Connectivity: Dual Nano SIM + eSIM, VoLTE/WiFI calling; Bluetooth codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LC3, Opus, LHDC V1, LHDC V2, LHDC V3, LHDC V5; SAR: Head SAR 1.290 W/kg, Body SAR 1.496 W/kg; Update policy: 5 years of Android updates, 7 years of security patches; CO2 footprint 53.2 kg, fanless, waterproofWeight218 g
Price899 EuroAmazon$657.41LinksNothing homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
构建Glyph Matrix 取代 Glyph 界面Nothing Phone (3) 的显示屏边框薄至 1.86 毫米，有黑色和白色两种颜色可供选择，给人留下了高品质的视觉印象。在做工方面也没有什么可抱怨的。不过，手机在扭动时确实会发出细微的噼啪声。
与前代产品相比，最大的创新在于透明的背面。标志性的 Nothing 设计依然存在，但 Glyph 界面已被 Glyph Matrix 取代--这是一个由 489 个 LED 组成的小型单色显示屏。
Glyph Matrix 位于右上角，可显示电池电量或接收到的信息等。显示屏（又名 Glyph Toys）可以通过下方的白色按钮进行切换。红色 LED 灯闪烁，表示正在进行音频和视频录制。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
尺寸比较
OnePlus 13 Nothing Phone (2) Nothing Phone (3) Samsung Galaxy S25+ Google Pixel 9 Pro Xiaomi 15 DIN A6 ❌
功能最高 16GB 内存和 512GB 存储空间Nothing Phone (3) 提供 NFC、蓝牙 6.0 和 Wi-Fi 7。SIM 卡插槽可插入两张 nano SIM 卡。也可以使用 eSIM 卡代替第二张实体 SIM 卡。
USB-C 端口只能以 USB 2.0 的速度工作，在三星 PSSD T7 的拷贝测试中达到了 36.7 MB/s。
左：音量摇杆
右侧电源按钮、人工智能按钮（基本空间）
顶部：扬声器、麦克风
底部：扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风、双 SIM 卡软件：Android 更新至 2032 年，以及用于 Glyph Matrix 的 SDKNothing Phone (3) 运行基于Android 15 的 Nothing OS 3.5。Nothing 承诺五年内提供操作系统升级服务，最高可升级至Android 20。Android 安全更新将每两个月提供一次，为期七年。
Nothing OS 3.5 扩展了标准的Android 界面，采用了独立设计和 Essential Space（一个帮助用户完成日常任务的人工智能中心）。
Essential Space 接收来自用户的输入。如果按下 Essential 按钮，它就会截屏或从相机应用中截取图像，并附带可选的注释。该按钮还可用于开始录音。
捕捉到的信息会自动转录并添加到人工智能中心。按两次按钮就可以调用和浏览这些信息。
有了 Glyph Matrix，用户就不必再使用现成的 Glyph Toys 了。感兴趣的用户可以加入Nothing 开发者计划下载 SDK，开发自己的 Glyph Toys。
可持续性边框、按钮和 SIM 卡托盘由 100% 再生铝制成。产品包装不含塑料，由 30% 的再生纸纤维制成。
Nothing 不提供备件或维修手册。不过，智能手机可以直接送到制造商处进行维修。
通信和全球导航卫星系统：快速 Wi-Fi 7 和精确导航除了强大的蜂窝频率覆盖，Nothing Phone (3) 还拥有快速稳定的 Wi-Fi 7。
我们结合华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器测得的传输速率高达 1,856 Mbps。
NetworkingNothing Phone (3)802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000
980 (min: 492) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
834 (min: 774) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1856 (min: 1764) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1577 (min: 1279) MBit/s ∼88%
Google Pixel 9 ProWi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
955 (min: 858) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
795 (min: 680) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1830 (min: 1666) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1602 (min: 1387) MBit/s ∼89%
Nothing Phone (2)Wi-Fi 6E iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1513 (min: 1097) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
799 (min: 577) MBit/s ∼45%
OnePlus 13Wi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
820 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
791 (min: 705) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1791 (min: 1704) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1464 (min: 769) MBit/s ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy S25+Wi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1094 (min: 655) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1154 (min: 1048) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1311 (min: 984) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1204 (min: 1187) MBit/s ∼67%
Xiaomi 15Wi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
876 (min: 445) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
871 (min: 785) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1386 (min: 628) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1793 (min: 1671) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000
956 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1040 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1289 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1495 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼83%
Average of class Smartphone iperf3 transmit AXE11000
690 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
731 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1274 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1398 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼78%
Nothing Phone (3) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1856 (1764-1884) MBit/sXiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1365 (628-1900) MBit/sNothing Phone (3) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1576 (1279-1627) MBit/sXiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1791 (1671-1841) MBit/sNothing Phone (3) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø964 (492-1002) MBit/sXiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø861 (445-968) MBit/sNothing Phone (3) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø833 (774-857) MBit/sXiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø869 (785-951) MBit/s
楼内 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收Nothing Phone (3) 非常适合导航。在测试中，它与 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表一样精确地指引我们到达 10 公里自行车路线上的目的地。
GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：环湖航行
GPS 测试：转折点电话功能和语音质量Nothing Phone (3) 支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话。它能在通话过程中提供良好的语音质量，还能有效抑制环境噪音。
摄像头：5000 万像素，一包四台使用自拍相机拍摄Nothing Phone (3) 的主摄像头、超广角摄像头和长焦摄像头的分辨率均为 5000 万像素。
自拍摄像头也有一个 5000 万像素的传感器，使智能手机能够拍摄出迷人的肖像，并为视频聊天提供非常可用的质量。所有镜头都能以最高 4K 60 fps 的高画质录制视频。
在白天，配备 1/1.3 英寸快速传感器的主摄像头能拍摄出漂亮的照片，其高动态范围和逼真的色彩给人留下了深刻印象，但有时也会出现模糊的情况。在弱光环境下，大尺寸传感器能捕捉到许多细节。
超广角摄像头拍摄效果不错，但照片边缘比较模糊。长焦摄像头还承担了微距镜头的任务，如果仅限于 3 倍光学变焦，则能获得良好的图像质量。数码变焦最高可达 60 倍，但在 5 倍放大时，拍摄对象已经变得模糊不清。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main CameraMain CameraUltra-wide5x ZoomLow lightclick to load imagesNothing Phone (3)Canon EOS 90DOppo Find X8 UltraXiaomi 15 Ultra0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesNothing Phone (3)Canon EOS 90DOppo Find X8 UltraXiaomi 15 Ultra0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesNothing Phone (3)Canon EOS 90DOppo Find X8 UltraXiaomi 15 Ultra0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesNothing Phone (3)Canon EOS 90DOppo Find X8 UltraXiaomi 15 Ultra0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesNothing Phone (3)Canon EOS 90DOppo Find X8 UltraXiaomi 15 Ultra0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
3.6 ∆E1.8 ∆E3.1 ∆E3.8 ∆E3 ∆E7.4 ∆E2.1 ∆E5.6 ∆E2.5 ∆E1.3 ∆E4 ∆E3.6 ∆E5.3 ∆E2.9 ∆E2.1 ∆E8 ∆E2.6 ∆E12.9 ∆E9.1 ∆E3.9 ∆E5 ∆E3.5 ∆E1.3 ∆E2.8 ∆EColorChecker Nothing Phone (3): 4.23 ∆E min: 1.29 - max: 12.93 ∆E18.2 ∆E21.5 ∆E20.3 ∆E22 ∆E23.8 ∆E32.1 ∆E24.3 ∆E13.5 ∆E14.6 ∆E16.6 ∆E29.5 ∆E32.7 ∆E13.2 ∆E25.3 ∆E9.8 ∆E22.6 ∆E19 ∆E25.1 ∆E20 ∆E19.7 ∆E21.9 ∆E24.3 ∆E19.9 ∆E12.2 ∆EColorChecker Nothing Phone (3): 20.93 ∆E min: 9.78 - max: 32.69 ∆E
Nothing Phone (3)Nothing Phone (3)
附件和保修：不含电源适配器交货包括一条 USB-C 连接线、一个 SIM 卡弹出工具和一本安全说明手册。出厂时，显示屏上贴有保护膜。Nothing 在线商店不提供 65 W 电源适配器。
Nothing Phone (3) 在欧盟享有 24 个月的保修服务。
输入设备和操作：无响应手机得益于清晰的 Nothing OS 3.5、快速的 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4以及反应灵敏的 AMOLED 屏幕的高触摸采样率，Nothing Phone (3) 使用起来非常流畅。线性振动电机与此相得益彰，因为它能提供精确的触觉反馈。
显示屏下方的光学指纹传感器解锁智能手机时没有明显的延迟。智能手机还可以使用 2D 面部解锁功能解锁，该功能也能可靠地工作，但安全性要低得多。
纵向键盘
横向键盘显示屏120 Hz LTPS AMOLED，90 Hz PWM子像素矩阵AMOLED 屏幕可以变得非常亮，但在测试中长时间达不到 Nothing 承诺的峰值亮度 4,500 cd/m²。
在纯白背景下，显示屏的平均亮度为 1,535 cd/m²。在小画面区域（1,517 cd/m²）和 HDR 模式（1,475 cd/m²）下，亮度值大致相同。
屏幕的 PWM 调光频率相当高，为 1,086 Hz（制造商规格为 960 Hz），振幅也很低，可以满足敏感用户的需求。
1541cd/m²1543cd/m²1546cd/m²1526cd/m²1548cd/m²1537cd/m²1517cd/m²1527cd/m²1534cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 1548 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1535.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.68 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 98 %Center on Battery: 1548 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.72}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}95.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.26CCT: 6787 K
Nothing Phone (3)AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.7"Google Pixel 9 ProOLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"Nothing Phone (2)OLED, 2412x1080, 6.7"OnePlus 13AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"Samsung Galaxy S25+Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.7"Xiaomi 15OLED, 2670x1200, 6.4"Screen42%16%22%4%10%Brightness middle (cd/m²)15482083 35%951 -39%1155 -25%1371 -11%1021 -34%Brightness (cd/m²)15352016 31%948 -38%1155 -25%1370 -11%1018 -34%Brightness Distribution (%)9884 -14%98 0%98 0%96 -2%98 0%Black Level * (cd/m²)Colorchecker dE 2000 *2.20.7 68%1 55%1 55%2.7 -23%1.3 41%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *5.52 64%2.2 60%1.8 67%4.2 24%2.9 47%Greyscale dE 2000 *3.71.1 70%1.6 57%1.6 57%2 46%2.2 41%Gamma2.26 97%2.22 99%2.203 100%2.3 96%2.03 108%2.25 98%CCT6787 96%6560 99%6516 100%6503 100%6450 101%6658 98%* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 90 HzAmplitude: 12.96 %Secondary Frequency: 1086 HzThe display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
分钟
25 %
50 %
75 %
100 %固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
AMOLED 面板的色彩配置文件调整得很好。我们发现标准色彩模式（默认设置为鲜艳）下的色彩最为准确。
ColorChecker （标准色彩模式，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（标准色彩模式，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（标准色彩模式，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
饱和度扫描（标准色彩模式，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5895 ms rise↘ 0.5825 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey7.86 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9615 ms rise↘ 6.902 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31 ms).
Nothing Phone (3) 在户外表现出色。其快速响应的亮度传感器可将视角稳定的屏幕亮度提高到一定程度，即使在晴天也能轻松阅读。如果关闭亮度传感器，最大亮度会降至 774 cd/m²。
室外使用
稳定的视角性能：搭载骁龙 8s 第 4 代处理器的 Nothing Phone (3)手机 (3) 没有配备 骁龙 8s 第 4 代.4 纳米 SoC 被官方认为是比 骁龙 8 精英版.
因此，Nothing Phone (3) 有足够的动力完成所有日常任务，而且在 12 GB 或 16 GB 内存的支持下，同时打开多个应用程序也不会拖慢速度。
Geekbench 6.7 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark Geekbench 6.7
Single-CoreSamsung Galaxy S25+Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3136 Points +42%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3087 Points +40%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3001 Points +36%Nothing Phone (3)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
2212 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (1893 - 2212, n=5)
2101 Points -5%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1971 Points -11%Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=192, last 2 years)
1863 Points -16%Nothing Phone (2)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1719 Points -22% Multi-CoreSamsung Galaxy S25+Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10029 Points +40%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9369 Points +31%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9202 Points +29%Nothing Phone (3)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
7161 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (6260 - 7161, n=5)
6780 Points -5%Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11811, n=192, last 2 years)
5545 Points -23%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4820 Points -33%Nothing Phone (2)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4584 Points -36%Antutu v10 - Total Score
OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2762122 Points +40%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2677100 Points +36%Samsung Galaxy S25+Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2271821 Points +15%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (1975046 - 2043045, n=3)
2010102 Points +2%Nothing Phone (3)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
1975046 Points Average of class Smartphone (264891 - 3269237, n=99, last 2 years)
1518133 Points -23%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1139380 Points -42%PCMark for Android - Work 3.x
Samsung Galaxy S25+Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
20673 Points +30%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
19793 Points +24%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
19192 Points +20%Nothing Phone (2)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
16612 Points +4%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (15928 - 15973, n=3)
15948 Points 0%Nothing Phone (3)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
15928 Points Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=146, last 2 years)
15116 Points -5%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
11823 Points -26%BaseMark OS II
OverallSamsung Galaxy S25+Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
13223 Points +33%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
11031 Points +11%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
10937 Points +10%Nothing Phone (3)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
9953 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (9930 - 9953, n=3)
9942 Points 0%Average of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=121, last 2 years)
8050 Points -19%Nothing Phone (2)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7839 Points -21%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
7716 Points -22% SystemSamsung Galaxy S25+Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17481 Points +57%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
16439 Points +47%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
14039 Points +26%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (11169 - 12968, n=3)
12361 Points +11%Nothing Phone (2)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12171 Points +9%Average of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=121, last 2 years)
11586 Points +4%Nothing Phone (3)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
11169 Points Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
8029 Points -28% MemoryXiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
16961 Points +21%Samsung Galaxy S25+Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
16264 Points +16%Nothing Phone (3)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
13961 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (11058 - 13961, n=3)
12032 Points -14%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11536 Points -17%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
10197 Points -27%Average of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=121, last 2 years)
9323 Points -33%Nothing Phone (2)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8458 Points -39% GraphicsSamsung Galaxy S25+Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
45691 Points +36%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
44189 Points +31%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
43637 Points +30%Nothing Phone (3)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
33672 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (33256 - 33672, n=3)
33480 Points -1%Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 61797, n=121, last 2 years)
25506 Points -24%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
23041 Points -32%Nothing Phone (2)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19110 Points -43% WebSamsung Galaxy S25+Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2353 Points +26%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2091 Points +12%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (1869 - 2101, n=3)
2004 Points +7%Nothing Phone (2)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1919 Points +3%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1879 Points +1%Nothing Phone (3)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
1869 Points Average of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=121, last 2 years)
1759 Points -6%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1202 Points -36%UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
36578 Points +113%Samsung Galaxy S25+Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
23141 Points +34%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
22767 Points +32%Average of class Smartphone (2895 - 78695, n=106, last 2 years)
20900 Points +21%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
18154 Points +5%Nothing Phone (3)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
17213 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (16446 - 17213, n=3)
16885 Points -2%Nothing Phone (2)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13807 Points -20%AImark - Score v3.x
Nothing Phone (2)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
128240 Points +8600%Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=83, last 2 years)
17366 Points +1078%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1982 Points +34%Samsung Galaxy S25+Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1891 Points +28%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1790 Points +21%Nothing Phone (3)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
1474 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (1389 - 1474, n=3)
1422 Points -4%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1146 Points -22%Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=115, last 2 years)
666 Points +48%Nothing Phone (3)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
451 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (180 - 469, n=5)
407 Points -10% Half Precision NPU 1.7Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=115, last 2 years)
2616 Points +480%Nothing Phone (3)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
451 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (167 - 468, n=5)
402 Points -11% Quantized NPU 1.7Average of class Smartphone (124 - 49889, n=115, last 2 years)
3918 Points +293%Nothing Phone (3)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
997 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (376 - 1032, n=5)
891 Points -11%AI Benchmark
Score V5Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=26, last 2 years)
470 Points +169%Samsung Galaxy S25+Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
245 Points +40%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (175 - 194, n=2)
184.5 Points +5%Nothing Phone (3)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
175 Points Score V6Samsung Galaxy S25+Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10534 Points +81%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (5828 - 7948, n=3)
6592 Points +13%Nothing Phone (3)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
5828 Points Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=81, last 2 years)
5803 Points 0%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1112 Points -81%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
991 Points -83%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
734 Points -87%
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6885 Points +53%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6789 Points +51%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5845 Points +30%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4490 Points Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2605 Points -42%Nothing Phone (2)Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2538 Points -43%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7029 Points +55%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6754 Points +49%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5995 Points +32%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4529 Points Nothing Phone (2)Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2754 Points -39%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2547 Points -44%3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26616 Points +49%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25785 Points +44%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24960 Points +40%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17885 Points Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9476 Points -47%3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12400 Points +48%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11821 Points +41%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10764 Points +29%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8357 Points Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12747 Points +48%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11879 Points +38%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11649 Points +35%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8624 Points Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2567 Points +45%Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2525 Points +42%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2258 Points +27%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1775 Points Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1026 Points -42%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2698 Points +51%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2599 Points +46%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2362 Points +32%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1784 Points Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1001 Points -44%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Nothing Phone (2)Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
768 fps +31%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
718 fps +23%Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
697 fps +19%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
585 fps Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
415 fps -29%Nothing Phone (2)Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
349 fps -40%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%Nothing Phone (2)Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
502 fps +51%Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
450 fps +36%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
423 fps +27%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
332 fps Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
245 fps -26%Nothing Phone (2)Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
211 fps -36%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps +73%Nothing Phone (2)Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
365 fps +44%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
308 fps +22%Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
283 fps +12%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
253 fps Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
165 fps -35%Nothing Phone (2)Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps -47%GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps Nothing Phone (2)Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -2%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -10%GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps +50%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
192 fps +34%Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
178 fps +24%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
143 fps Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps -41%Nothing Phone (2)Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps -47%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps +92%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps Nothing Phone (2)Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -2%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps -22%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps +46%Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
107 fps +35%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps +27%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79 fps Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -44%Nothing Phone (2)Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -47%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps +28%Nothing Phone (2)Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
321 fps +54%Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
286 fps +38%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
274 fps +32%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
208 fps Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -43%Nothing Phone (2)Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps -46%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +49%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +49%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
47 fps +34%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps Nothing Phone (2)Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps -43%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps -43%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
334.386 Points +44%OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
238.78 Points +2%Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
232.968 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (174.8 - 245, n=5)
226 Points -3%Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
191.986 Points -18%Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
178.548 Points -23%Average of class Smartphone (63.9 - 423, n=125, last 2 years)
160.8 Points -31%Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
108.429 Points -53%Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
446 runs/min +29%OnePlus 13 (Chrome 140)
404 runs/min +16%Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
347 runs/min Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (339 - 348, n=3)
345 runs/min -1%Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
342 runs/min -1%Average of class Smartphone (49.3 - 733, n=85, last 2 years)
254 runs/min -27%Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
207 runs/min -40%Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
162 runs/min -53%Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
31.6 runs/min +48%Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
29 runs/min +36%Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
23.5 runs/min +10%Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome)
21.3 runs/min Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (19.7 - 22.1, n=3)
21 runs/min -1%Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
15.8 runs/min -26%Average of class Smartphone (3.06 - 45.5, n=95, last 2 years)
15.6 runs/min -27%WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
239 Points +74%OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
235 Points +72%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (137 - 185, n=3)
168.7 Points +23%Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
168 Points +23%Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
147 Points +7%Average of class Smartphone (56 - 306, n=104, last 2 years)
142.7 Points +4%Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
137 Points Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
106 Points -23%Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
98817 Points +37%OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
92054 Points +28%Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
78653 Points +9%Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
71875 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (71781 - 71902, n=3)
71853 Points 0%Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
60566 Points -16%Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
52931 Points -26%Average of class Smartphone (2800 - 126661, n=151, last 2 years)
52170 Points -27%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=129, last 2 years)
1066 ms * -105%Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
755.5 ms * -45%Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
699 ms * -34%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (521 - 534, n=3)
527 ms * -1%Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
521.2 ms * Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
454.4 ms * +13%OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
432.7 ms * +17%Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
388.7 ms * +25%* ... smaller is better
Nothing Phone (3)Google Pixel 9 ProNothing Phone (2)OnePlus 13Samsung Galaxy S25+Xiaomi 15Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-5-63%-42%-13%-16%-11%-9%-37% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)3720.791717.9 -54%1949.5 -48%3984.23 7%4057.35 9%3934.92 6%3709 ?(1851 - 4512, n=51) 0%2244 ?(270 - 4370, n=180, last 2 years) -40% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)3270.73253.53 -92%1517.6 -54%3684.36 13%3311.02 1%3889.06 19%3123 ?(1494 - 4051, n=51) -5%1928 ?(103.2 - 4113, n=180, last 2 years) -41% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)438.57218.41 -50%287.5 -34%301.29 -31%294.51 -33%296.95 -32%383 ?(204 - 512, n=51) -13%312 ?(47.6 - 614, n=180, last 2 years) -29% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)585.11261.55 -55%403.8 -31%344.63 -41%351.16 -40%360.36 -38%479 ?(45.7 - 987, n=51) -18%358 ?(13.1 - 1071, n=180, last 2 years) -39%
游戏：保证游戏流畅配备 Adreno 825-GPU 的 骁龙 8s 第 4 代智能手机能流畅运行当前的游戏。这一点也可以通过Gamebench工具进行的帧数测量也证明了这一点。
在所有图形设置下，智能手机都能达到最高帧率，只有游戏的内部帧率限制会降低帧率。
不过，在《PUBG Mobile》中，最低细节级别也能达到 120 帧/秒。
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
Nothing Phone (3); Asphalt 9: Legends; 45.0.9a: Ø89.2 (82-91) fpsNothing Phone (3); Genshin Impact; 5.8.0_35245262_35356052: Ø60 (53-61) fpsNothing Phone (3); PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.9.0: Ø119.7 (118-121) fpsNothing Phone (3); PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.9.0: Ø59.9 (58-61) fpsNothing Phone (3); PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.9.0: Ø39.9 (37-41) fps
排放：无热智能手机表面温度Nothing Phone (3) 在负载情况下会变得非常热。在 Burnout Benchmark 的压力测试中，我们测得的表面温度高达 52.1 °C。在这样的负载下，你不会想触摸智能手机。
3DMark 压力测试表明，智能手机在负载情况下会迅速降低 SoC 性能，在最糟糕的情况下，SoC 性能会降低到初始性能的 60% 以下。
Max. LoadIdle
51.2 °C52.1 °C49.2 °C 51.7 °C51.6 °C47.4 °C 51.6 °C51.8 °C45.1 °C
Maximum: 52.1 °CAverage: 50.2 °C
45.8 °C47.4 °C49.7 °C44 °C48.9 °C51.4 °C42.4 °C46.5 °C50.3 °C
Maximum: 51.4 °CAverage: 47.4 °C Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
28 °C28.1 °C27.5 °C 27.9 °C27.6 °C28.1 °C 28 °C28.4 °C27.2 °C
Maximum: 28.4 °CAverage: 27.9 °C
26.2 °C26.2 °C26.4 °C25.7 °C26.7 °C26.7 °C26 °C26.3 °C26.7 °C
Maximum: 26.7 °CAverage: 26.3 °C Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 50.2 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.1 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.4 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
3DMarkSteel Nomad 压力测试
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test StabilityGoogle Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67.6 % +6%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.3 % +4%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63.8 % Nothing Phone (2)Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60.2 % -6%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.7 % -13%Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.4 % -16% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestNothing Phone (2)Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87.3 % +41%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.3 % +12%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68.7 % +11%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61.9 % Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51.3 % -17%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 % -18% Solar Bay Stress Test StabilityNothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77.2 % Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.9 % -13%Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.9 % -24%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48.1 % -38% Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityGoogle Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77.3 % +34%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69.5 % +20%Samsung Galaxy S25+Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.5 % +15%Nothing Phone (3)Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.9 % OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.7 % -12%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø19.7 (17.2-27.8) %Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.8 (10.6-15.3) %Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø10.3 (10.2-11.6) %OnePlus 13 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.1 (19.9-39) %Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø23.5 (19.9-38.9) %Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø29 (26.2-38.2) %Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø72.7 (64-100.4) %Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø44.8 (36.4-53.9) %Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.1 (38.2-63.4) %OnePlus 13 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø92.1 (73.8-132.4) %Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø84.2 (71.3-133.4) %Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø101.2 (87.7-132.2) %Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø93.9 (88.2-109.2) %Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø49.2 (41.3-56.4) %Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø114.4 (89.3-165.7) %Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø117.4 (98.5-139.4) %Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø19.7 (16.7-28.4) %Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø26.8 (23-41.1) %Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø22.9 (21.3-27.6) %OnePlus 13 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø28.1 (19-39.4) %Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø24.9 (21.4-36.3) %Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø27.8 (24.8-37.1) %Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø10 (7.77-13.4) %Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø6.37 (5.73-7.42) %OnePlus 13 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø14.1 (9.52-18.8) %Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12 (10.9-16.3) %Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.8 (12.2-17.6) %
地表温度：顶部
表面温度：底部扬声器虽然立体声扬声器很难产生低音，但它们的声音特性却非常均衡，中高音线性分明，因此得分很高。
外置音频设备可通过 USB-C 和蓝牙 6.0 与智能手机连接。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Nothing Phone (3) audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.2 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)Compared to same class» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
能源：配备硅碳电池的无手机 (3)耗电量相当节能的 Nothing Phone (3) 充电速度可达 65 W。
根据 Nothing 的说法，一个充电周期需要 54 分钟，而我们在使用 65 瓦的 Ugreen 2C1A 电源装置时测得的时间为 55 分钟。34 分钟后，电池已充满 80%。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.03 / 0.35 WattIdle 0.4 / 0.7 / 1.21 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Nothing Phone (3)5150 mAhGoogle Pixel 9 Pro4700 mAhNothing Phone (2)4700 mAhOnePlus 136000 mAhSamsung Galaxy S25+4900 mAhXiaomi 155400 mAhAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 Average of class Smartphone Power Consumption-35%-66%-106%-21%-26%-91%-89%Idle Minimum * (Watt)0.40.59 -48%0.9 -125%0.86 -115%0.45 -13%0.5 -25%0.96 ?(0.4 - 1.3, n=3) -140%0.878 ?(0.39 - 1.7, n=138, last 2 years) -119%Idle Average * (Watt)0.71.1 -57%1.1 -57%1.74 -149%1.09 -56%1.11 -59%1.38 ?(0.7 - 2, n=3) -97%1.472 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=138, last 2 years) -110%Idle Maximum * (Watt)1.211.2 1%1.4 -16%1.85 -53%1.13 7%1.13 7%1.663 ?(1.21 - 2.3, n=3) -37%1.655 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=138, last 2 years) -37%Load Average * (Watt)7.15510.6914.418.917.11 ?(6.6 - 7.62, n=2)6.72 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=103, last 2 years)Load Maximum * (Watt)20.3710.411.9216.379.311.1 ?(8.92 - 13.3, n=2)11.3 ?(4.75 - 22, n=103, last 2 years)* ... smaller is better
电池寿命Nothing Phone (3) 的 5,150 mAh 电池是迄今为止 Nothing Phone 最大的电池，在容量方面也明显优于前代产品。
测试机在电池续航时间方面也遥遥领先。在 WLAN 测试中，它的续航时间接近 18.5 小时，远远超过了前代产品。 Nothing Phone (2)和 谷歌 Pixel 9 Pro甩在了后面。
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
18h 23min
Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Nothing Phone (3)5150 mAh
18.4 h Google Pixel 9 Pro4700 mAh
17 h Nothing Phone (2)4700 mAh
15.2 h OnePlus 136000 mAh
22.5 h Samsung Galaxy S25+4900 mAh
19.8 h Xiaomi 155400 mAh
22.8 h
Notebookcheck 对 Nothing Phone 的总体印象 (3)Nothing Phone (3) 结合了不同寻常的设计、强大的硬件、出色的摄像头、大容量电池和直到 2032 年的更新。
不过，这款 6.67 英寸的高品质手机并不像 Nothing 所宣传的那样是一款旗舰智能手机。
Back to the verdict
Nothing Phone (3)
- 08/25/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero
Chassis91%
Keyboard67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device92%
Connectivity54 / 69 → 78%
Weight88%
Battery91%
Display90%
Games Performance38 / 55 → 69%
Application Performance75 / 85 → 88%
AI Performance25%
Temperature79%
Noise100%
Audio84 / 90 → 93%
Camera84%
Average74%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions89.1%Materials50%Packaging50%Power Use96.4%Repairability40%Software Updates94.5% Total Sustainability Score: 70%
潜在替代品比较
ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightDriveDisplay
1.84.8%Nothing Phone (3)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 825 ⎘16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.xAmazon: List Price: 899 Euro218 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"2800x1260460 PPIAMOLED
2.85.7%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘16 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 3.1Amazon: 199 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.30"2856x1280495 PPIOLED
3.87.4% v7 (old)Nothing Phone (2)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 730 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1Amazon: 1. $409.99Nothing Phone (2) 5G - 6.7�...2. $569.05Nothing Phone (3) Cell Phone...3. $551.08Nothing Phone (3) Cell Phone...List Price: 699€201.2 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2412x1080394 PPIOLED
4.87.6%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.xAmazon: $839.99List Price: 720€213 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"3168x1440510 PPIAMOLED
5.88.4%Samsung Galaxy S25+Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.xAmazon: List Price: 1149 Euro190 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"3120x1440513 PPIDynamic AMOLED 2X
6.88.4%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.xAmazon: List Price: 760€191 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.36"2670x1200460 PPIOLED
More articles related to this deviceNothing Phone (3) (Phone Series)News•没有什么电话广告会在严厉批评后消失，至少是部分消失 |News•重新定义 "旗舰"：对 "Nothing Phone "的评价 (3) |News•Nothing Phone (3) 通过软件升级获得相机升级和 Glyph Matrix 照片 |News•无摄像头测试：便宜的 Phone (3a) Pro 让 "旗舰 "Phone (3) 望尘莫及 |News•手机 (3) 花了 2 年时间才问世，却与我们的预期大相径庭，原因何在？ |News•Nothing Phone (3)：Nothing的首款 "旗舰 "手机令人失望且价格过高 |Review•更多百万像素 - Nothing Phone (3a) Pro 智能手机评测 |Review•优雅的多功能手机，按键一应俱全 - Nothing Phone (3a) 评测 |Review•Nothing Phone (2a) Plus 评测--配备独家处理器、价格不贵的时尚智能手机 |Review•Nothing Phone (2a) 评测--首款经济实惠的 Nothing 智能手机 |News•Nothing Phone (2a) 发布日期曝光，贝聿铭解释这款智能手机与众不同之处 |News•无手机 (2a)：渲染图像、欧元价格、颜色和配置泄露 |News•Nothing Phone (2) 成为首款获得Apple iMessage 官方支持的Android 智能手机 |News•Nothing Phone (2) 通过 Nothing OS 2.5 Beta 更新首次体验Android 14 新功能 |News•Nothing Phone (2) 通过 Nothing OS 2.0.3 更新获得口袋模式、改进的 Glyph 界面支持和其他更改 |News•Nothing Phone (1) 现可使用 Nothing OS 2.0 更新，其中包含各种更改和用户界面改进 |Review•Nothing Phone (2) 评测：价格合理的高端智能手机中的 LED 效果 |Review•评论。Nothing phone（1）--中档价格的透明设计师作品 Related Articles
中端产品综述：Nothing Phone (4a) Pro vs.Galaxy A57 和Redmi Note 15 Pro+
05/12/2026
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro：功能强大的中端智能手机
05/12/2026
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 805508 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via: